Fox's Eric Bolling Compares Obama To A Drug Dealer Who Opens "Barry's Pot And Coke Emporium"
February 07, 2012 5:40 pm ET
From the February 7 edition of Fox News' The Five:

Media Matters: Changing The Tone, Or Changing Our Understanding?
Media Matters: Fox's 2012 GOP Influence
Media Matters: The Fox News divide that never was|
|
||
It does underline how money doesn't just talk in United States politics. Thanks to the reprehensible Citizens United decision, and its effective overturning of a hundred years of practical and legal precedents, money screams. It's the worst Supreme Court ruling in generations.
You could expand that apt description to the Democratic Party as a whole.
~
MiniTru..
great metaphor. you wonder if beckle will snap and stuff eric "meadowlark" bolling in a trash can someday. i'd watch that.
It's not what he says, it's the 'look', that FOX bots saver.then just pour the talking points over the visual.
Check out Bill Moyer's Journal this week with Jonathan Haidt
Where's the pith?
It would be like in pro football if they changed the rules to make field goals worth five points instead of three, and then call any coach who disliked with the new rule a hypocrite for accepting the extra two points or any victories that came as a result of the rule changes.
Unfortunately, the other team isn't going to respect your position or integrity when they have the opportunity to use the change in rules to their advantage, and the changes in campaign financing brought about by Citizens United is no different. Whether you like it or not, the people who wanted it got it, and they're going to bury you with superpac money if you don't adapt.
Thats what makes these Pacs so amazingly bad. These billionaires and multi millionaires are willing to donate tens of millions of dollars to GOP candidates so that they dont have to pay millions more in taxes. I thought that if they had to pay these taxes, they couldn't hire middle class workers. How are they supposed to hire people when they give all their money away to Super Pacs?
I do believe that the Superpacs are wrong for this country. There are a handful of people who are buying the election.
Not saying this is a good thing, just explaining.
I can't wait for the Romney/Obama debates!
Sweet Moses.
So you are a liar and a moron and you are spewing the talking point du jour AGAIN. Shocking I say. Do you ever just begin sobbing uncontrollably when you realize you are always going to be this stupid and this pathetic?
Let's say honor duels are legal and I'm morally opposed to their legality. Then let's say that I'm inescapably put in a position where I'm in an honor duel. I'm not going to throw the gun down and draw a knife (assuming I'm not James Coburn in The Magnificent Seven) I'm going to use the legitimate tools that give me a fighting chance. If I prevail, I can still be morally opposed to honor duels and my forced participation in one doesn't change that or present a case of hypocrisy.
It's really kind of an interesting position for Obama. "Please contribute to my Super PAC so I can work to eliminate Super PACS." It's reasonable.
You're like a brainless DVR. Just push the button and you replay every Fox talking point of the day.
And whenever I hear a Conservative make an argument, 99% of the time, it is retarded nonsense like this.
WHAT THE HELL IS WRONG WITH YOU PEOPLE?!
Are you simply incapable of preseenting an argument to anyone who doesn't already agree with you 100%? Don't you realize that this probably means YOU'RE WRONG?! Or, at a minimum, INCREDIBLY STUPID?!
I'll make a wager right now with any Conservatives on this board: If Romney gets the nomination, I'll vote for him if you can give ONE EXAMPLE of Obama's "failure" that is (1) Based in FACT and (2) NOT an direct result of his capitulating to or compromising with REPUBLICANS. Give me one GOOD, ACTUAL reason, and I'll give you my vote. Hey: He's gonna need every vote he can get! And I live in a battleground state!
(Not if Gingrich or Santorum get it though. Nothing will make me vote for those scumbags.)
---------------------------------------
IMHO
UTOPIA
Eddie -- They are not Conservatives in any true meaning of the term. they are Reactionaries who want to go back to "The Good Old Days" that never were. Since those days never were, how can they defend them logically? In short they live in Fantasy-land.
Those who refuse to learn the lessons of history are condemned to repeat it.
If anyone had said that about Junior the Magnificent when he was dictator, they would have been water-boarded or worse