Quick Clip
Print

Discussing Fox-hyped Black Panthers case, Severin rants about Obama being "demonstrably a racist"

July 02, 2010 2:57 pm ET

From the June 30 edition of WTKK's The Jay Severin Show:

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

Previously:

Fox's Kelly deceptively cites DOJ testimony to further Adams' attacks

DOJ accusers' ties to Bush DOJ's "legacy of politicized hiring"

Glenn Beck and Jay Severin: friends deserving of each other

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by progressivevoicedaily (July 02, 2010 3:05 pm ET)
      6  
      Oh yeah, The president has demonstrated his racism everywhere. This guy Severin makes me sick. He's definitely a Beck wannabe!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Sharpe (July 02, 2010 3:19 pm ET)
      6  
      selectively catering to communists or some other political group would not qualify as racism - just sayin
      Report Abuse
      • Author by LKL (July 02, 2010 8:23 pm ET)
           
        Right! I can't stand to listen to that drivel again, but he didn't just flat-out contradict himself? First, he says there is "no question" that Obama selectively enforces laws based on race, then he says that it's liberals, regardless of race, who won't be prosecuted by Obama. Huh?
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Brutus (July 02, 2010 3:25 pm ET)
      9 1
      So, my question to this Severin clown is, what part of President Obama is racist? Is it the white part or the black part? If the President is racist against his other half, then does he fight the internal racism that resides in him?

      I have had it with the racism projection and accusations. The real racists reside on talk/hate radio, teabaggers, and it is well documented everyday. The excuses of being taken out of context, or it was all a joke do not fly with me.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by pilotx (July 02, 2010 3:30 pm ET)
      7  
      Takes one to know one huh? Childish rants aside, I'm now officially tired of these guys trying to make the false equivalency that somehow everything is the same. This was a bogus case and it was all caught on tape. What really happened? Who was harmed? What rights were violated? Man, this whole only Black and Brown people are racists and the Dems and libs are the real racists stuff is getting quite old. Just admit your tea party contains a few bad apples instead of trying to play tit for tat and looking foolish. Geez.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by mhughen (July 02, 2010 3:32 pm ET)
      7  
      Severin was suspended by his own radio station for calling immigrants "criminalians" "primitives" and "leaches." and claiming that Mexico only imports "women with mustaches and VD."

      Methinks Severin is the one with he race problem.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by cst (July 02, 2010 3:40 pm ET)
      5  
      Then DEMONSTRATE it already!
      (Although I suspect your "demonstration" will just reveal your OWN...)
      Report Abuse
    • Author by seahawks123 (July 02, 2010 3:44 pm ET)
      2 14
      So why did the DOJ kill the investigation even when there was video evidence?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by mhughen (July 02, 2010 3:51 pm ET)
        4  
        Please cite/link/show your evidence, SH123.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by seahawks123 (July 02, 2010 3:57 pm ET)
          1 11
          YouTube - "Security" patrols stationed at polling places in PhillyNov 4, 2008 ... queue Black Panther VOTER INTIMIDATION Thug Tactics9746 viewsnobama08no ยท 3:16. Add to queue. Added to queue Voter Intimidation in ...
          www.youtube.com/watch?v=neGbKHyGuHU
          Report Abuse
          • Author by bintx (July 02, 2010 4:01 pm ET)
            9  
            There is no evidence of voter intimidation, squawks. This is just a Fox news video. No one reported being intimidated and the video doesn't show any sort of intimidation . . . . just being a black person doesn't qualify for intimidation.

            Oh, and they weren't Black Panthers. The Black Panther organization has been defunct for almost 40 years. They claimed to be members of The New Black Panther Party, completely unrelated.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by New Frontier (July 02, 2010 4:08 pm ET)
            6 1
            Copy-and-Paste fail. Imagine Dr. Seahawks doing the same to your bone structure.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by IRONY 101 (July 02, 2010 4:27 pm ET)
            2  
            Nobody ever said voting would be EASY... ;>)
            Report Abuse
          • Author by mhughen (July 02, 2010 5:10 pm ET)
            7  
            Here is Seasix 'evidence': A video showing (white) people, unassailed, walking into the establishment, the admission by fox news that the police were called and the scary suspects were removed/left the area, no witnesses claimed to be harassed.
            Here is what the 2 Black men are guilty of:
            1-bad judgement to bring a nightstick. This might be an actual legal offense, but I would leave it to the local authorities to determine . . . after all, AKs at a Presidential visit is OK.

            2- being scary, especially to white racists. Fortunately for them, being 'Scary While Black' is no longer illegal or a federal offense.

            Seasix 'evidence' of voter intimmidation falls a little short of federal election fraud. Now, if these guys worked for ACORN we would see conservative heads exploding, which, I have to admit, would be fun in a 'Scanners' sort of way.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by soze169880 (July 02, 2010 5:28 pm ET)
              2  
              The guy doing all the talking is quite possibly the least intimidating Black Panther I've ever seen in my life. But at least this helps prove what whiny, sniveling cowards the GOP are.
              Report Abuse
          • Author by Johaely (July 02, 2010 7:21 pm ET)
            1  
            The video didn't show any intimidation, just two guys dressed in militia garb standing in front of a building. They didn't approach the cameraman wiloently, the guy with the nightsick just asked what he was doing with that camera. If just their pressence was enough to be considered intimidating, then you must really go out more.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by raddave43 (July 02, 2010 3:55 pm ET)
        5  
        Because the DOJ decided there was not enough evidence to proceed with the case. See this is how the prosecution works in a case. They weigh the evidence and if they feel they have enough to get a conviction, they proceed with the case, if not it is dropped. If the DOJ decided there was not enough evidence and proceeded with a case, then one it would be a political stunt and nothing more and two, would leave themselves open to a lawsuit.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by seahawks123 (July 02, 2010 3:55 pm ET)
            11
          Yeah, just tell your self that.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by bintx (July 02, 2010 4:01 pm ET)
            7  
            Actually, squawks, that's EXACTLY how it works.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by raddave43 (July 02, 2010 4:04 pm ET)
            8  
            I don't have to tell myself that, I am telling you that, since you have no concept of how the justice system works.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by mjh (July 02, 2010 4:19 pm ET)
              8  
              And, you'd think Seahags would know. That's exactly what the teabaggers kept saying when the Duke Lacrosse rape case was dropped . . .

              Report Abuse
              • Author by soze169880 (July 02, 2010 4:50 pm ET)
                6  
                This is DIFFERENT. There are NEGROES in BERETS. How are you people all not as comically terrified as me?!
                Report Abuse
          • Author by cugagcmu805031 (July 02, 2010 5:18 pm ET)
            4  
            Why is ex-Senator Ted Stevens not in federal prison?

            The prosecutors in the Bush DOJ flubbed the case, and the Obama DOJ dropped the case. Ex-Senator Stevens was caught on audiotape discussing CYA efforts with Bill Allen (VECO) to avoid prosecution. Allen renovated one of Stevens' houses free of charge, and Stevens didn't report it on his financial disclosure forms.

            This is a clear example of the Obama DOJ dropping a case against a white man who would most likely have been found guilty if the case had moved forward, so if you want to buy Fuchs Noose's bull about the president being a racist, why didn't he continue to pursue the Stevens case?

            I know. I know. Your only sources for news are rw operations.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by mikehuck1976 (July 03, 2010 11:53 am ET)
            1  
            OOOok. I'll bite. How do YOU think it works, Hawk?
            Report Abuse
        • Author by egb (July 02, 2010 5:21 pm ET)
            7
          "DOJ decided there was not enough evidence ..."
          That's how it works in most organizations. Eric Holder ordered the
          end of this investigation. Like the AZ law, he hadn't read the briefs. The lead attorney had the evidence in hand and a won case and it was dropped. The Dems would be upset if Minutemen stood in front of the polls in Hispanic polling areas. Why are people here so blind? The NBP's and anyone else barring the say to a polling place holding a weapon should be put in jail, irrespective of color, language, nationality, gender, religion or favorite ice cream.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by soze169880 (July 02, 2010 5:24 pm ET)
            2  
            It's covered above why everything in your post is BS.
            Why are people here so blind?

            Beck fan.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by bintx (July 02, 2010 5:28 pm ET)
            3  
            egb, you constantly show your ignorance here. You repeat talking points as fact and it makes you look silly.

            There was no evidence whatsoever of intimidation. You had two black men standing outside a polling place. One stupid one, had a nightstick in his hand. They were removed. No prosecutor in his right mind would prosecute a case like this. He will LOSE. There is NO evidence of voter intimidation.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by mikehuck1976 (July 03, 2010 11:54 am ET)
            1  
            What was the case based upon? And what was the evidence? Who was barred from entering the building? The videos you guys are using actually seem to refute that claim.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by bintx (July 02, 2010 3:58 pm ET)
        6  
        There wasn't video evidence. Fox has a video of two black men standing on the steps, but there was no video of them intimidating anyone. Other people at the voting site said that they were not intimidated by these folks. No prosecutor in his/her right mind would take a case like this to trial with this kind of "evidence."

        Oh, and these guys were NOT members of the "Black Panthers." That organization has been defunct for almost 40 years. These people called themselves members of "The New Black Panthers," but, if I'm not mistaken, even that group said they didn't know anything about these two men.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by CoolSlaw (July 02, 2010 4:17 pm ET)
          6  
          I saw the video as well, and while those guys look a little intimidating with the berets and boots... you'll notice in the background, people (white people included) are kind of milling around and entering and leaving the polling place without any incident.

          I think these men standing in front of the polling place might have shown better judgment in the way they presented themselves. If I saw people dressed like that (people of any color) standing in front of my polling place, I'd probably be a little wary and wonder what was going on. These men are definitely guilty of making a very poor public relations decision regarding their organization. I could see getting some kind of citation issued for the guy holding the nightstick, but as long as you can't prove they actively took part in preventing people from voting, or harrased people as they approached the polling place, you can't really make a "federal case" of this (pun intended).
          Report Abuse
          • Author by bintx (July 02, 2010 4:20 pm ET)
            3  
            Exactly. They interviewed numerous people and none stated that these men "intimidated" them. Well, except the hand-picked Fox interviewees who really couldn't say WHY they were intimidated. I saw this the day it happened. It really looked more like a Fox set-up than anything else.

            No prosecutor in his/her right mind would try to prosecute this case. It would be a waste of taxpayer dollars and would, most likely, end in a not guilty verdict. Just no evidence of any wrongdoing at all, except the nightstick.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by egb (July 02, 2010 5:27 pm ET)
              6
            Do you think it would have been hard to find a person to testify
            that he came to the polling place and was scared away by the threatening appearance of three militants at least one of them armed?

            We don't allow that in the South anymore and it shouldn't go on anywhere else. These guys should have been hauled off to jail immediately, tried convicted, fined $1000 and let of of jail the next day. Now it is a political nightmare that will grow over time as the political winds change. And Eric Holder can be handed the direct responsibility for making this story into a scandal that is likely to bring someone down.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by soze169880 (July 02, 2010 5:29 pm ET)
              2  
              that is likely to bring someone down.

              Let's keep your fantasies out of this, shall we? No one's getting "brought down" over this, because it's bullsh!t. Skip to whatever your next fantasy was (assassination, I'm assuming.)
              Report Abuse
            • Author by bintx (July 02, 2010 5:33 pm ET)
              3  
              EGB, there was NO EVIDENCE of voter intimidation. Understand? This is a Fox created "news" story. They tried to run with it on Election day and it was debunked then by the BUSH DOJ.

              Seriously, dude, you really need to start understanding that these folks on Fox and hate talk radio MANIPULATE people like you. They aren't presenting conservative values or beliefs. They are in it solely for the money. That's all, and they LAUGH at the schmucks who believe them.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by spittinghotfireonrepukes (July 02, 2010 6:46 pm ET)
                2  
                Here, Here!!!

                EGB...you're absolutely right, there is no way on God's green earth 2 black men can get away with standing around doing absolutely nothing in any town down south USA while voting. No that's what you good old southern conservative whites do!!!
                Report Abuse
            • Author by JoeSixpack (July 03, 2010 7:11 am ET)
              3  
              So what if he was armed? That's his 2nd amendment right, isn't it? Or does the right to bear arms, which you guys are always going on about, only apply to white conservatives?
              Report Abuse
            • Author by mikehuck1976 (July 03, 2010 11:56 am ET)
                 
              Do you think it would have been hard to find a person to testify
              that he came to the polling place and was scared away by the threatening appearance of three militants at least one of them armed? - egb

              Well, if it is so easy then I am sure you have the list of witnesses and evidence they were barred from the building, right? I mean you cannot be so stupid as to make this claim with no evidence to support it, can you? Are you actually this ignorant of our justice system?
              Report Abuse