County Fair
Print

Fox Hypes Daily Mail Article To Help Palin Promote "Death Panels" Lie

June 30, 2012 12:42 am ET by Chelsea Rudman

Fox News host Greg Gutfeld hyped a Daily Mail article that smears end-of-life care in Britain as "euthanasia," repeating the article's false claim that "130,000 elderly patients are euthanized prematurely" because of the health care system there. In fact, the kind of care that these patients receive is offered only after their doctors "agree that all reversible causes for their condition have been considered."

Gutfeld made his claim while the show he co-hosts, The Five, was hosting Fox News contributor Sarah Palin to discuss the Supreme Court ruling upholding the Affordable Care Act. Palin again peddled the long-debunked claim that the Medicare Independent Payment Advisory Board is a "death panel" that "will tell you ... whether your level of productivity in society is worthy of receiving the rationed care that will be the result of Obamacare."

Gutfeld agreed with Palin and responded: "To your point, the Daily Mail in the U.K. reported that 130,000 elderly patients are euthanized prematurely because they don't have enough room for beds. Which goes to your point -- inevitably, this is what happens."

The Daily Mail article in question cites one British professor who claims that doctors in the U.K.'s National Health Service (NHS) "are prematurely ending the lives of thousands of elderly hospital patients" under the Liverpool Care Pathway (LCP), "a method of looking after terminally ill patients."

But that Daily Mail article has already been discredited by a medical group with a membership of 4,000 U.K. doctors. The head of public policy at the Christian Medical Fellowship (CMF), Dr. Peter Saunders, noted in a blog post that while it "is certainly true that 130,000 British patients per year are dying whilst on the LCP," it "does not therefore follow from this that the LCP is the cause of their deaths." As Saunders explains, only patients who are "imminently dying" can be placed on the pathway in the first place:

The Liverpool Care Pathway for the dying patient (LCP) is a treatment pathway used in the final days and hours of life which aims to help doctors and nurses provide effective end of life care.

It was initially developed between the Royal Liverpool Hospital and the City's Marie Curie Hospice in the later 1990s and recommended to hospitals by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence in 2004.

[...]

Before a patient can be placed on the pathway the multi professional team caring for them have to agree that all reversible causes for their condition have been considered and that they are in fact imminently dying.

[...]

It is certainly true that 130,000 British patients per year are dying whilst on the LCP. But it does not therefore follow from this that the LCP is the cause of their deaths.

Saunders acknowledges that there may be people "who are being placed on the LCP inappropriately," but writes that the "overwhelming majority" of patients are receiving "much better care at the end of life than they would have had if [the LCP] had not been used." He also cites a 2009 audit of 155 hospitals that showed "where the LCP is used people are receiving high quality clinical care for the last hours and days of life."

Gutfeld's prediction about euthanasia "inevitably" coming to the U.S. doesn't make much sense -- under reform, the U.S. health care system will be nothing like Britain's. Great Britain has a "truly socialized" health care system in which care is delivered by government hospitals and doctors. The health care reform law doesn't abolish private insurers or even create a competing public option -- as PolitiFact has noted, the law "relies largely on the free market."




Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by handsomejack54 (June 30, 2012 1:29 am ET)
      13  
      I saw an article over at AddictingInfo which compiled some of the most ridiculous Twitter posts after the Supreme Court's decision. The most ridiculous posts where people complaining of a non-existent threat of socialized medicine in the U.S., and their response is to move to Canada, which actually has socialized medicine. Yeah....those people aren't very bright.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by jonjstrine42 (June 30, 2012 1:33 am ET)
      10  
      Why let facts get in the way of a good, thoroughly debunked smear?
      And can someone please tell me why Caribou Barbie is still considered relevant?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by temphandle osiris43extol (June 30, 2012 2:43 am ET)
        9  
        Because she is the Best that Fox news has. No one else will take the job except this political has been. Her 15 minutes of fame were over and she needs a job, because no one else would give her one.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by jonjstrine42 (June 30, 2012 3:00 am ET)
          6  
          Oh, but I thought she was a best-selling author?

          Sorry. Is my sarcasm showing?
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Chief Bromden (July 01, 2012 7:30 am ET)
            1  
            Koch brothers/Richard Mellon Scaife/Moonie bulk buying.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by highlyunlikely (June 30, 2012 2:49 am ET)
        9  
        As far as I can tell she isn't relevant beyond the FOX bubble. The only times I come across her are when another media outlet plays a clip of her pontifications in order to mock her.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by steeve (June 30, 2012 11:05 am ET)
        2  
        Barbie is relevant because her policy and stupidity is indistinguishable from the main driving force in American politics.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by CoolSlaw (June 30, 2012 8:50 am ET)
      6  
      To viewers of Fox news, the "death panels" myth was never debunked.

      It really is an alternate universe that they inhabit, and it's frightening to realize how effective conservative media has been in shaping our political landscape while promoting blatant falsehoods.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by grmce (June 30, 2012 9:52 am ET)
      8  
      Do you realise that 100% of patients in the U.S. health system die? In fact, many of them may linger for decades. The inhumanity of this truly appalls me.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by MickD (June 30, 2012 8:11 pm ET)
        3  
        "If they would rather die, . . . they had better do it, and decrease the surplus population." ~ The Repub Bible.

        They love Scrooge before the first ghost visits. Real party man.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by steeve (June 30, 2012 11:05 am ET)
      2  
      Some of these health care talking points have a second part to them that never seem to get on TV.

      Obamacare is unconstitutional... because it's not medicare for all, which is constitutional.

      "A panel will decide if you're productive enough to keep living"... which would be a fairly direct implementation of conservative ideology.

      Conservatives can't invent wrongdoing, they can only project it. They already want the "unproductive" dead.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by eweston8542983 (June 30, 2012 12:08 pm ET)
           
        And of course only the rightwing true believers would have the noble objectivity to determine who is unproductive.

        And if reality shows them to be wrong, that those dead are somehow desperately needed, they will either charge over the cliff anyway in denial, or complain about people who have rudeness to be dead.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by thaneb (June 30, 2012 11:29 am ET)
      6  
      This is the POV that wanted Terri Schiavo kept "alive". It was driven to vilify her husband to that end. It is driven by an absolutist "right-to-life" even with massive brain damage (confirmed at death) of the Persistent Vegetative State. Under this mythology, a video selected to show tracking a balloon and select few "experts" trumps medical science. This is the audience to which Fox plays.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by danielsangeo (June 30, 2012 3:28 pm ET)
        3  
        Well, of course. Belief always trumps science, even if the science and evidence show that their belief is in error. Reality must be wrong.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by 1949vet (July 01, 2012 2:03 pm ET)
      3  
      The Five, was hosting Fox News contributor Sarah Palin to discuss the Supreme Court ruling
      'Next up on Fox, Britney Spears will discuss the differences in particle accelerators between the linear and the circular or cyclic type.'
      Report Abuse
    • Author by politeradical (July 01, 2012 5:52 pm ET)
         
      The death panel/rationed care myth is one of the few remaining refuges they have left. Their other claims about the ACA e.g. unconstitutional, will put people in jail, taxpayer funded abortions etc. have been shattered. They lost the battle in Congress and now their SCOTUS pipe dream is in ashes.

      However, when all else fails, apocalyptic predictions to scare the crap out of their base always work.
      Report Abuse