County Fair
Print

Limbaugh Dismisses DOJ Civil Rights Abuse Hotline As A "Tattle-Tale Line"

June 26, 2012 5:30 pm ET by Emily Arrowood

Attacking a Department of Justice hotline for potential civil rights abuses in Arizona, Rush Limbaugh declared that reporters of such abuses are merely "tattle-tales" or "criminals" who "can now snitch out law enforcement." But the potential civil rights concerns over the law - especially concerns about racial profiling - are very real.

Although the Supreme Court struck down most of SB1070, Arizona's controversial immigration law, it allowed the so-called "show me your papers" provision to go into effect. In an effort to keep tabs on potential racial profiling abuses, the federal government launched a hotline and email address where people can report potential civil rights concerns.

Limbaugh labeled the hotline a "tattle-tale line," created so that "ticked-off, sniveling little liberals" "can call and rat out Arizona law-enforcement officials to Barack Obama." He went on to address Arizona residents:

LIMBAUGH: When your police and your sheriff departments try to do their jobs, left-wing lawyers stand ready to bury your bogus law suits, at the request and the behest of Barack Obama. This hotline, this email address, is criminalizing the enforcement of the law.

[...]

What this is all about is the presumption that law enforcement does nothing but profile. And they're gonna profile. And who gets to decide whether it's profiling or not? A former ACLU lawyer, former La Raza lawyer at the Department of Justice?

[...]

Criminals can now snitch out law enforcement, folks. Barack Obama has sided with people who are on the other side of the law.

In reality, racial profiling concerns over Arizona's immigration law are legitimate.

Legal experts and law enforcement officers agreed that the law could encourage racial profiling, as race and socioeconomic class stereotypes may be relied upon to establish reasonable suspicion. Even the Supreme Court suggested that the so-called "show me your papers" provision may later be found unconstitutional. The legal experts at SCOTUSblog explained:

Section 2(B) of the law requires the police to check the immigration status of persons whom they arrest before releasing them.  It also allows the police to stop and arrest anyone suspected of being an undocumented immigrant.  The Court held that the lower courts were wrong to prevent this provision from going into effect while its lawfulness is being litigated.  It was not sufficiently clear that the provision would be held preempted, the Court held.  The Court took pains to point out that the law, on its face, prohibits stops based on race or national origin and provides that the stops must be conducted consistent with federal immigration and civil rights laws.  However, it held open that the provision could eventually be invalidated after trial.

What's more, a federal hotline to report potential civil rights abuses from a state immigration law is not unprecedented. A nearly identical hotline was introduced in October of 2011 when the Alabama immigration law was enacted.




Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by DAWUSS (June 26, 2012 5:34 pm ET)
      3  
      Speaking of Limbaugh, where's the advertisers list? Has that been abandoned?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by progressivevoicedaily (June 26, 2012 5:37 pm ET)
        1  
        I'd be willing to bet that Clear Channel did some back room hostage negotiations with some of the bigger advertisers. They probably threatened to black list company advertisements on other programs and radio stations that Clear Channel owns and operates if that company continued it's boycott. Corporate America is still in control, make no mistake about it.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Invent a Scandal (June 26, 2012 6:47 pm ET)
             
          indeed,
          90% of talk radio is conservative and in corporate control, they're carpet bombing this country with el Flushbo and his knock-offs.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by Invent a Scandal (June 26, 2012 6:49 pm ET)
             
          indeed,
          90% of talk radio is conservative and in corporate control, they're carpet bombing this country with el Flushbo and his knock-offs.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by DAWUSS (June 26, 2012 8:18 pm ET)
             
          OK, but then why did all the activists let up? From the sounds of it, Limbaugh wins again...
          Report Abuse
      • Author by David2012 (June 26, 2012 8:31 pm ET)
           
        I think Rush has found a niche. His talent is for saying things that based on current events he knows will be insulting to a large part of the country of which he is a citizen. He creates rage. He creates chaos. His cause? His cause is Rush.

        It's shock jock stuff writ large, and he has done so, so, so much damage to our country, the country of all of us, Democrats and Republicans. It is amazing.

        There's become an industry of this, of who can insult their fellow citizens in the most inflammatory terms, who can make the spotlight shine in their direction. I wonder whether this is what Ted Turner envisioned when he invented the 24/7 news cycle.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by bintx (June 26, 2012 6:17 pm ET)
      2  
      It's the constitutionality hotline.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by handsomejack54 (June 26, 2012 6:25 pm ET)
      4  
      When people live in an AZ county (Maricopa) where the sheriff (Arpaio) has a bit of a habit of arresting minorities (particularly Hispanic minorities) just to prove that he can, regardless of the fact that he is currently being investigated for supposed "abuse of power", Limbaugh is the last person allowed to speak about this. Why?
      HE LIVES ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE FREAKING COUNTRY.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by xlrrp173 (June 26, 2012 7:45 pm ET)
      5  
      "ticked-off, sniveling little liberals"

      I'd love to have this obese, draft-dodging, drug addled, pedophile, pile of steaming buzzard puke call me that to my face. I'd show him what a "sniveling little liberal" could do to his fat face. I'd like to see if he could do his hate-fest with his pie hole wired shut.

      Oh wait, he doesn't set foot out side of his compound, does he?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by stopspending (June 26, 2012 10:24 pm ET)
          4
        You sound like such a nicer person. I would love to meet you and call you a ticked-off, sniveling little liberal. I suspect you will be hiding in your momma's basement if you thought someone would really confront you face to face.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Johaely (June 27, 2012 4:57 pm ET)
             
          Wow, a basement dweller quip? Haven't heard those in years. They are as stale as ever.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by OtterQueen (June 27, 2012 12:03 am ET)
         
      Violate one of Rush's civil rights and see how fast he spins up.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by danielsangeo (June 27, 2012 12:23 am ET)
           
        He'll go whining to the ACLU like a "ticked-off, sniveling little" child like he did last time it happened.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Maimonides 03 (June 27, 2012 5:58 am ET)
         
      Has anyone ever noticed he uses schoolyard analogies alot? He talks about tattle-tales, bullying, whining, etc... I wonder if this is to appeal to listeners. Do most of them operate on the playground level?

      He often describes others as "whiners". Or he talks about people having tantrums, as he himself whines and throws a tantrum.

      It is very interesting...lol
      Report Abuse
    • Author by magnolialover (June 27, 2012 8:16 am ET)
      1  
      Yeah, of course, why would people in Arizona need a hotline to report civil rights violations when they honest stand up lawmen like Joe Arpaio?

      Oh, wait, never mind. Answered my own question.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by magnolialover (June 27, 2012 8:17 am ET)
      1  
      Yeah, of course, why would people in Arizona need a hotline to report civil rights violations when they honest stand up lawmen like Joe Arpaio?

      Oh, wait, never mind. Answered my own question.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by SpeakUp (June 27, 2012 10:06 am ET)
         
      Listen to Rush again and consider exactly who it is that sounds "ticked-off and sniveling." Is he not the personification of the alleged condition? This is a recurring irony of right-wing nomenclature. More often than not, they are what they accuse the left of being. That point should be made often in all media response to the right as a way of holding them up to the ridicule they so richly deserve and which would serve to diminish their now outsized influence with much of the American public.

      Report Abuse