Live Action's New Planned Parenthood Attack Manufactures "Widespread" Sex-Selective Abortion Problem
May 29, 2012 11:34 am ET by Justin Berrier
Discredited anti-choice activist Lila Rose launched her latest video hoax, claiming that a highly edited video proves that Planned Parenthood is facilitating rampant "gendercide" in America. But statistics show that sex-selection simply does not happen with any regularity in the United States, as the vast majority of abortions are performed before gender is detectable, and the gender birth ratio in America is close to even.
Rose on Tuesday released undercover footage purporting to show a clinic worker in Austin, Texas, discussing health care options with a woman who claimed to want to terminate her pregnancy if she was carrying a girl. Live Action's accompanying petition suggests that Planned Parenthood is complicit in "Widespread sex-selection by means of abortion." This video hoax is part of a campaign aimed at "exposing the practice of sex-selective abortion in the United States and how Planned Parenthood and the rest of the abortion industry facilitate the selective elimination of baby girls in the womb."
But the first video demonstrates that Rose can show no such effort to facilitate rampant sex-selection abortion.
In a companion post to the video, Live Action pointed to global statistics showing sex-selection in countries such as China and suggested a similar problem occurs in the United States, warning:
U.S. census data and national vital statistics show that indeed, sex-selection is a growing problem in America. Americans are employing sex-selection techniques in their reproductive decisions.
But actual evidence shows that sex-selection in America is neither widespread nor growing. According to the CIA's World Factbook, the gender ratio at birth in the United States is 1.05 males to females, a rate that the Guttmacher Institute calls "squarely within biologically normal parameters." The United States simply does not have a gender imbalance that would indicate that sex-selection occurs with any regularity.
Further, most abortions are performed before gender is identifiable. The Centers for Disease Control reported that in 2008, 91.4% of abortions were performed before the 13th week of pregnancy. Robert Shmerling of Harvard Health Publications noted that gender identification by means of ultrasound, by far the most popular method, is usually only available by the 16th to 20th week. Although there are methods to detect gender earlier on in a pregnancy, "these procedures are usually performed to detect potential health problems such as Down's syndrome, spina bifida, or cystic fibrosis, not to find out a baby's gender."
As Planned Parenthood's Leslie Kantor and Carolyn Westhoff recently noted, Planned Parenthood "finds the concept of sex selection deeply unsettling" and the organization "does not offer sex determination services; our ultrasound services are limited to medical purposes." Kantor and Westhoff further noted:
Planned Parenthood condemns sex selection motivated by gender bias, and urges leaders to challenge the underlying conditions that lead to these beliefs and practices, including addressing the social, legal, economic, and political conditions that promote gender bias and lead some to value one gender over the other.
Planned Parenthood's mission mandates that it provides information to patients on all of their legal options in an environment free of judgment, and one that respects the privacy, rights, and choices of the individual. Explaining legal options to women who ask about them is a fulfillment of the organization's goal "to provide comprehensive reproductive and complementary health care services in settings which preserve and protect the essential privacy and rights of each individual."
Attempting to tie Planned Parenthood to a problem that does not occur with any regularity in the United States is further indication that Live Action, and its founder, Lila Rose, are willing to engage in dishonest and misleading campaigns to smear an organization with a history of dedication to improving women's health.
UPDATE: In a statement to The Huffington Post, Planned Parenthood responded to Live Action's latest attack:
A Planned Parenthood spokeswoman told The Huffington Post on Tuesday the staffer in the video "did not follow our protocol" for dealing with "a highly unusual patient scenario."
"Planned Parenthood insists on the highest quality patient care, and if we ever become aware of a staff member not meeting these high standards we take swift action," she said in a written statement. "Within three days of this patient interaction, the staff member's employment was ended and all staff members at this affiliate were immediately scheduled for retraining in managing unusual patient encounters. Today opponents of Planned Parenthood are promoting an edited video of that hoax patient encounter."
This spokeswoman for Planned Parenthood Federation of America also told The Huffington Post that the organization condemns seeking abortions on the basis of gender, but its policy is to provide "high quality, confidential, nonjudgmental care to all who come into" its health centers. That means that no Planned Parenthood clinic will deny a woman an abortion based on her reasons for wanting one, except in those states that explicitly prohibit sex-selective abortions (Arizona, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania and Illinois).








</snark>
I forgot what I was saying. But it was something about We the People!!!
If anything, I think attacks like this is going to make more and more people come to realize how crazy this woman and Live Action are, and how crazy many anti-abortion groups really are too. Not all are, but most of them are either taken over by the extreme fringe of the anti-abortion people or formed by them.
Speaking of which, I somehow would not doubt if Rose actually got kicked out of another group for her methods.
We had a similar problem in Australia some years back when the Right Whinge Murdoch hacks were looking for an issue and discovered that there were literacy problems in some U.S. schools. From that they extrapolated that there was a massive literacy crisis in the entire Australian public education system. We're still having trouble with the fallout from that.
These liars not only need to be debunked but utterly destroyed as commentators on any matter and hounded from public life.
It's the same tactic that the Nazi's used when they were starting their rise to power. Their arguments could be debunked, but it took time to do it. The only problem is that the Nazi's were pushing out fallacy after fallacy about everything from Jews, Gays, Gypsies, the mentally and physically handicapped, Communism, atheists, etc. etc..
It's pretty similar to what the right wing media is doing.
Again, this is not how investigative journalism should be done. You don't come up with your conclusion BEFORE you do the journalism like Rose does.
Lila Rose, on becoming a conservative "journalist."
Theory
Testing
Prove/Disprove/Modify
Repeat
Lila's Method:
Theory - Planned Parenthood is bad.
Testing - None needed, I know it's true!
Proof - If I rearrange stuff or take it out of context, it looks like proof...that's good enough for me!
Repeat - (unfortunately)
Only because it makes you wonder what their real issue is.
Most of PP's clientele is from low income households who don't have any other options when it comes to health care. What are these people going to do if Lila (and others) succeed in shutting PP down?
Becuase they stood idly by while the Right took down Acorn with lies and bushllit - actualy, no I take that back: They HELPED the Right tale down Acorn, many voting with their 'Republican bretheren' to defund them.
And I will not be the least bit surprised to see them take what the (mistakenly, IMHO) believe to be the politicaly expedient route once again and remian silent while the Right rides roughshod over women's reproductive rights, or worse - supports their efforts to take down organizations that provide such needed and necessary MEDICAL services such as Planned Parenthood. (Which includes Cancer screenings, pre-natal care and contacective services.)
If they rise up and condemn this nonsesne? And vote IN UNISON against any measures that will defund them? FINE. I'll take it back. but I've yet to see this kind of leadership from the Dem's, who have apparently forgoten who their constituency is.
------------------------------
IMHO
UTOPIA
We need more like her.
I've had the honor to speak with her about medical technology and healthcare in an informal setting at UCSF and she is the real deal. No BS. Knows her stuff, listens to learn more, asks good questions and has a staff that is also wicked smart.
------------------------------
IMHO
UTOPIA
or:
Does this then prove definitively to the right that there is a glass ceiling and that women haven't achieved equality under the law?
Sorry, but this is not only fraudulent and dishonest, it's bizarre and doesn't even make sense from a socio-economic standpoint.
I'm just wondering where these American families are that want to ensure male children are being born. I haven't ever once in my life heard an American couple lament the misfortune of having only girls, or more girls then boys, or anything like that.
LiveAction is just spreading fear and lies.
Why else would they come up with this nonsense?
They don't care about life. If they did, they'd focus their effort and energy toward things that would actually reduce the "need" for abortions. The fact that the zealots also oppose those things tells us all we need to know about them. It's not about life. It's about imposing THEIR rigid ideology on people whose personal decisions they wish to control.
As I drive to work in the morning, I pass the strip mall where our Planned Parenthood is located. There are always a few dried up, completely disheveled appearing elderly blokes perched outside holding offensive signage. There is NO WAY these clowns have even the vaguest concept about young women in our society. These fools are simply bummed out that they can't control others pure and simple. It would never dawn on them they'd be far more successful if they focused actual effort on helping people, rather than berating them. Again, it tells us all we need to know. Another case of "conservatism" being a club for people ill-equiped to deal with reality.
Pro-choice people need to make this case emphatically though: We want to lower the number of abortions too. We just want to do it in a way that doesn't cause widespread human misery and most importantly actually works, by preventing unwanted pregnancies.
Perhaps that's the direction we need to take to discredit them. Again and again I hear the canard that there's this "abortion industry" in the US that is only in it for the money. Having worked with OB/GYNs on cancer I don't see people going into abortions for the money.
But without question there are large anti-abortion groups who raise funds whose only product or service is to pay themselves. The money certainly isn't getting to teens and young women to help with birth control or sex education. The fact is, as you note, the money is specifically designed to AVOID providing people with accurate sex education or providing effective birth control.
This is the rightwing strategy:
-cast doubt on a reliable institution
-use invented stories, not facts
-get as much airtime as possible for your fake stories
People like Breitbart, O'Keef and Lila Rose are using this strategy. This is how it starts, silence voices,destroy things you disagree with and dehumanize your opponents.
FORWARD...FORWARD...FORWARD
Breitbart is dead. He is no longer using any strategy.
Another linked article is about "customizing conception," or using preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) via IVF to conceive a desired gender; again, not about terminating a female fetus.
Live Action is skewing scholarly articles to support their made-up thesis. It's disgusting.
It is currently legal to obtain an abortion due to the baby's sex in this country, that is true. It's equally true, based on the evidence, that it is not an epidemic.
The truth of the matter is that, through free contraception, instruction on contraception, and working to maintain women's health, Planned Parenthood has prevented far more abortions than it has taken part in.
The truth of the matter is that Planned Parenthood is one of the staunchest, most powerful allies that people seeking to reduce the number of abortions performed in this country can have.
The truth of the matter is that abstinence only education is a complete and utter waste of time and money. Ask Bristol Palin.
The truth of the matter is that if it's not helping rich white men, the Republicans/Faux Cons are against it, no matter what it is.
Go F*** Yourself, Lila Rose. I don't need you snooping around my vagina.
What is Go F@#$ yourself Lila Rose...yeah!!!!
These people are the quintessence of deranged.
"I'm not some tribal guy dancing around for rain or running from a lion, man! Thats what those guys in socialist third world countries are...them are anti-colonial dudes from the country of Africa."
You got to dumb it down for them.
Does she work for some organisation and get paid to do this?
Or, does this relentless obsession with all things Planned Parenthood stem from more private and personal historical reasons?