County Fair
Print

Gingrich: Obama is engaged in "Kenyan, anti-colonial behavior"

September 12, 2010 12:28 am ET by Jeremy Schulman

Since the beginning of the Obama presidency, right-wing media -- especially those who work at Fox News -- have been carrying out a campaign of not-so-subtle race-baiting.

Today, Fox News contributor Newt Gingrich took this campaign to new levels, reportedly telling the National Review that Obama has pretended to be "normal" but that Obama actually seems to be engaged in "Kenyan, anti-colonial behavior":

Citing a recent Forbes article by Dinesh D'Souza, former House speaker Newt Gingrich tells National Review Online that President Obama may follow a "Kenyan, anti-colonial" worldview.

Gingrich says that D'Souza has made a "stunning insight" into Obama's behavior -- the "most profound insight I have read in the last six years about Barack Obama."

"What if [Obama] is so outside our comprehension, that only if you understand Kenyan, anti-colonial behavior, can you begin to piece together [his actions]?" Gingrich asks. "That is the most accurate, predictive model for his behavior."

"This is a person who is fundamentally out of touch with how the world works, who happened to have played a wonderful con, as a result of which he is now president," Gingrich tells us.

"I think he worked very hard at being a person who is normal, reasonable, moderate, bipartisan, transparent, accommodating -- none of which was true," Gingrich continues. "In the Alinksy tradition, he was being the person he needed to be in order to achieve the position he needed to achieve . . . He was authentically dishonest."

Here's the completely ridiculous D'Souza article Gingrich is referencing. D'Souza's thesis -- backed up by an impressive combination of factual distortions and twisted logic -- is that Obama is using the Oval Office to push anti-colonial policies championed by his father half a century ago.

Here's one particularly inflammatory portion of what Gingrich calls D'Souza's "stunning insight":

Incredibly, the U.S. is being ruled according to the dreams of a Luo tribesman of the 1950s. This philandering, inebriated African socialist, who raged against the world for denying him the realization of his anticolonial ambitions, is now setting the nation's agenda through the reincarnation of his dreams in his son. The son makes it happen, but he candidly admits he is only living out his father's dream. The invisible father provides the inspiration, and the son dutifully gets the job done. America today is governed by a ghost.

Fox's race problem just keeps getting worse.

[H/T Dave Weigel]

UPDATE: Gingrich was interviewed on the September 12 edition of Fox News Sunday, but host Chris Wallace did not ask him about his racially-charged assertion that Obama might have a "Kenyan, anti-colonial" worldview.




Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by phredicles (September 12, 2010 12:31 am ET)
      42  
      So I guess The Newt's Point is: Vote for Newt, and bring back philandering, inebriated PRO-colonial behavior.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Bad News (September 12, 2010 12:05 pm ET)
        19 2
        Pro-Colonial Behavior?
        Newt Gingrich, Kunta Kinte & Fiddler? I wonder who would be whose Savior.
        Newt Gingrich, He all but has President Obama Casted in a Reproduction of "Roots"
        He sees The President of the United States as a Cotton Picker, it's his idea of Green Shoots.

        Speak truth to power.


        Mr. News
        Report Abuse
    • Author by soze169880 (September 12, 2010 12:51 am ET)
      36 2
      How... special to see that by condemning perceived "anti-colonialism", they're by default coming down on the side of the White Man's Burden. I mean, it was obvious in their foreign policy for years, but the right gets more disturbingly honest about their agenda every day.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by doggeddem (September 13, 2010 12:16 pm ET)
        7 1
        Precisely. He wants to bring back slavery and colonialism. How he must long for those days of mint julips on the porch of his plantation.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by jc@tx (September 12, 2010 12:55 am ET)
      29 1
      I'd like see Newt run for President on that!

      he's obviously lost whatever mind he once had.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by mk3872 (September 12, 2010 12:39 pm ET)
        11 2
        Careful what tho wishes for in these upside-down crazy-anger times in this country. Just you wait until the tea baggers gain control of congress this year. It's gonna get very, very ugly.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by NiceguyEddie (September 13, 2010 11:54 am ET)
          8  
          Personally I think (and I HOPE) that BECAUSE of the Tea-Baggers, the Right (meaning Republicans and the Tea-Party combined) will end up falling short of that goal as they end up alientating moderates and in some case splitting the vote on the Right. Overall they'll make gains, but they'll lose some seats that they should have won easily if they had any party cohesion or actual GOOD IDEAS. (ANY ideas!)

          I don't think they will win back either majority. The democrats may end up holding one by just one seat, but that will prove my point: It will be a seat they Roght COULD HAVE (and should have) won, if they were at all reasonable.

          --------------------------------------------
          And they'll lose most of the gains they make in 2 more years, when Obama is on the ballot again.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by indigo1968 (September 13, 2010 9:22 pm ET)
            4  
            The teabaggers are doing what I always thought they would: splitting the GOP's conservative base.

            The funniest part, however, is that apparently Republicans themselves failed to see this coming in their rush to hop in bed with the Tea Party. And now that the GOP's finally woken up and found themselves wed to a small army of lunatics, they have no idea how to get a quickie divorce.

            But hey, conservatives wanted the likes of Sarah Palin to be their guiding light.

            Now they've gotten their wish.
            Report Abuse
    • Author by soze169880 (September 12, 2010 1:09 am ET)
      28  
      P.S. Isn't D'Souza the guy who said al Qaeda had no choice but to attack us, since queers are so nauseating?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by MRF (September 12, 2010 2:24 am ET)
        23  
        Sure is and he was never called out for it. He implied that al Qaeda attacked us because of our libertine values i.e. gays, womens rights etc.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by cst (September 12, 2010 9:24 am ET)
        21  
        Colbert forced D'Souza to confess, on the air, that in many ways he agrees with Al Queda's values. (I remember it vividly, because Colbert never pushed any of his guests that hard since- he totally demolished the guy on every level- while pretending to agree with him, of course. I think he's held back since, aware that he'd NEVER get guests on the show if he did that all the time...)
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Frankeee (September 13, 2010 12:57 am ET)
          7  
          If you could provide me with a link or even just a general date, I would be blown away
          Report Abuse
          • Author by cst (September 13, 2010 9:38 am ET)
            7  
            Sorry, I'm in Canada and can't link directly to Comedy Central ( I get redirected to Canada's "Comedy Network", which isn't the same thing). But if it helps, I remember it was the same week as the much-hyped appearence of Bill O'Reilly (at the time, I thought that Colbert may have let O'Reilly off easy BECAUSE he'd been so brutal with D'Souza...)
            Report Abuse
          • Author by Disputed Zone (September 13, 2010 3:30 pm ET)
            5  
            I believe this is it: Part 1 & Part 2
            Report Abuse
      • Author by Jollymon (September 13, 2010 1:32 pm ET)
        9  
        D'Souza is also someone who thinks blacks are still too defiant because they were slaves and blames that attitude on the fact they broke free of slavery (if that makes any f'n sense), doesn't agree with most aspects of feminism, believes in intelligent design, and thinks that the seperation of church and state is unfair to religious people.

        So bravo Newt for using him as your reference to attack Obama.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by News Corpse (September 12, 2010 2:52 am ET)
      24  
      So Gingrich thinks that D'Souza's delusions about Obama's father is the "most profound insight" he's read about Obama? Even though Obama's father left the family when he was two years old. Obama saw him only once after that when he was ten. And D'Souza and Gingrich think that Obama has modeled his whole life and political philosophy on a man he never knew and who abandoned him?

      That's some pretty profound insight.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by indigo1968 (September 13, 2010 9:27 pm ET)
        6  
        Anyone whose paid attention to even a casual biography of Obama knows that he barely knew his father, and was closest to his mom and her parents. But the likes of D'Souza and Gingrich are more than happy to attack the president's late father anyhow.

        Both men make me ill.

        I truly hope that Gingrich runs for POTUS. I can't wait to see all the dirty laundry he's accumulated throughout his sorry life thrown back in his face.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by mdey (September 12, 2010 3:07 am ET)
      28  
      Isn't being Anti-Colonial a very pro-American ideal? Does Newt wish we were still colonized by the British? The Kenyan crap is obviously an olive branch to the Birthers.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by spacemoth (September 12, 2010 4:44 am ET)
      16 1
      i can't... wha...? this is so f'ing crazy. this man gets paid to do this?!?! there are people homeless and starving, but he's blessed with wealth for all his hatred. lewis black would say: funnily enough... this fragmented description could be applied to anyone in the gop... hehe.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by dogbreath (September 12, 2010 8:55 am ET)
        21  
        Well, he IS their intellectual giant. To me, THAT's the scaries part of the whole thing. Gingrich is supposed to be this well-educated, professoral type of Republican. In reality, he just uses his intellect to manipulate and frighten people. He is an absolute con man, through and through.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by highlyunlikely (September 13, 2010 6:24 pm ET)
          7  
          "Malignant narcissist" works for me. Of course, that describes almost too many conservative figures to count.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by grmce (September 12, 2010 6:16 am ET)
      19 1
      I presume that Gingrich is involved in Southern U.S. post Civil War white man behaviour.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by rtejon (September 12, 2010 11:10 am ET)
        12  
        It won't surprise you that there's plenty of that mindset in his old congressional district around Cobb County, GA.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by MRF (September 12, 2010 12:21 pm ET)
          16 1
          No shock there. The same folks who wanted Darwin removed from the science textbooks and in the early 90's passed a ban on gays in the county. All while he was engauging in sodomy with his mistress.


          It was also the home of the John Birch Society and it's leader congressman Larry McDonald.


          For 40 years they blocked a decent mass transit system now they have some of the worst congestion in the country.

          When the right always shouts about San Francisco values how come no one responds with a critique of Cobb County values.


          The larger question is why do we give this man any airtime. He quit as speaker in 1998.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by cugagcmu805031 (September 13, 2010 8:17 pm ET)
            3  
            Then they had the nerve to get upset when VA beat GA in the race to get funding for high speed rail, and of course, it was Obama's fault. This place is the worst of all places to find people living in an upside down world. They continue to complain about traffic jams on the freeways, but they rejoiced when a metro ounty lost its bus system. They want services but don't want to pay for them, and oh, more tax cuts. They keep electing the same people to the GA General Assembly and expecting a different result. It was because of Governor Perdue and the majority led republican state legislature's refusal to commit to investing in high speed rail that caused the state to lose out on billions for hsr.

            The same thing happened in my city. When our former mayor, Jack Ellis, wanted to connect our city's rail system to others inside and outside of the state, the local yokels, including Erick Erickson opposed it because they felt that Ellis, partly because he was the city's first African American mayor, didn't know what he was talking about. Well, when oil prices went up a couple years ago, they bemoaned the fact that we didn't have a passenger rail service. Now, the city is practically begging private agencies to get hsr service and struggling to raise the funds. Ellis did a lot to improve the city like paving roads, ridding the city of substandard housing, bringing new businesses into the city, etc. Last month they voted against a one cent local option tax to build a much needed new courthouse because they hate taxes, and the vote totals were split along racial lines. We AAs voted for the one cent increase, and you can guess who voted against it, but they continue to complain the loudest about the scarcity of parking space available downtown when they have business at the courthouse.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by SrgVPMedia1120 (September 13, 2010 8:39 pm ET)
            2 1
            They voted down getting MARTA in Cobb County because they were worried it would start a crime wave with the blacks riding the trains. Of course if you ask a conservative about it they will deny it was for racial reasons. And then if you push them on it, they will pull the "Hey, how about Robert Byrd" card.
            Report Abuse
        • Author by So Fain (September 13, 2010 9:33 am ET)
          13  
          Cobb County, GA.

          Which is where I live and work everyday... Sitting in it right now. On behalf of the six other people with a conscience in this district, I'd like to take this space to apologize.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by MsYellowDog (September 13, 2010 3:08 pm ET)
            7  
            I know exactly how you feel,So Fain.I live in deep East Texas,and there are only a few in my county who would dis-believe what Gingrich says,or even think it was out of the ordinary that he had said it at all!So while I'm writing,I'll go ahead and apologize for Rick Perry,George Bush,and John Cornyn.Hope that helps you.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by cugagcmu805031 (September 13, 2010 8:19 pm ET)
            3 1
            I'm down in Bibb County (Macon,) but I refuse to apologize for Erick Erickson. I blame the voters who put him on our city council, and CNN for giving him a national platform from which to spread his special brand of madness.
            Report Abuse
    • Author by New Frontier (September 12, 2010 8:24 am ET)
      27  
      GINGRICH:

      "He (Obama) was authentically dishonest", said the thrice-married adulterer, failed former Speaker and ethics violator.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by congero6189599 (September 12, 2010 10:38 am ET)
        13  
        The hyprocrisy was lost definetly on the host and I bet most if not all Faux viewers. If we had real journalist the Newter would be laughed off the TV and out of politics.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by MickD (September 12, 2010 11:25 am ET)
      12  
      If Newt ran for dog catcher I would plaster whatever medium I could get a hold of with the pictures of his three wives. The only thing Repukes seem to respond to is a cad.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by bob.rutledge (September 12, 2010 11:46 am ET)
      11  
      Wait a minute:

      Newt Gingrich can read?

      This changes everything, because now rather than being his wife or a member of his 'inner circle' who tell him what to think, we might be able to get factual information to him through the written word.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by SMTDL (September 12, 2010 12:34 pm ET)
      13 1
      What unbelievable nonsense.Dinesh Souza has what credentials or real facts to come up with such an outrageous claim?Gingrich just shows his utter bias and racism to just buy into it with no thought or balance..how conveneient to claim this is stunning insight!!!It's stunning alright ..stunning ignornace and bigotry towards such a pragmatic President.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by pilotx (September 12, 2010 9:40 pm ET)
        11 1
        This just shows how intellectually bankrupt the right wing is. D'Souza went on a debate tour with Chris Hitchens and he argued he could "scientifically" prove the existance of a god, more to the point the Christian god. He then proceeded to use the most illogical and easily disproven arguments to not prove the existance of god. If you use big words and graduate from an Ivy League school you are automatically granted the presumption of intellect. This is true on both sides but on the left we expect you to actually be intelligent and back this up with reasonable facts and data while the right is just happy to have someone from this strata on their team. Just ask yourself, how do these jerks know this? Are they experts on Kenyan anti-colonial philosophy? Have they ever talked to the president about this topic?
        Once again, being from Chicago and gone to the same places the president and I identify with him moreso than I do with Newt.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by mk3872 (September 12, 2010 12:40 pm ET)
      17  
      That is one of the most hateful over-heated things that I have heard the "thoughtful" right-wing conservative minds in this country say to date.

      And no doubt that he'll get away with it and still get positive happy stories written about him by the MSM & Politico in particular.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by draftedin68 (September 12, 2010 2:50 pm ET)
      15  
      Naked Newt

      This is about the best example I've ever seen exposing the true nature of Newt Gingrich, a premiere merchant of slime.

      His I-sound-so-intellectual-I-can't-possibly-be-lying delivery causes instant salivation to those who'd never dream of actually thinking about what he's just said.

      I mean, as long as he's so eloquently crapping on President Obama, why bother checking his facts?


      Report Abuse
    • Author by dandelion (September 12, 2010 5:49 pm ET)
      20  
      I don't think Gingrich believes a word that he's saying. He's become so grossly cynical that these media appearances are simply opportunities to implant dog-whistle language to score partisan points. "Kenyan," "con," "Alinsky." Remember, this is the guy who distributed that list of negative words to use when describing Democratic policies ("pathetic," "decay," "failure").

      He's not stupid; he's knows exactly what he's doing. But does no one in the mainstream media call him ou? We've known about his tactics for 16 years now. And yet the interviewers (not only at Fox) just smile and nod and accept his ridiculous framing as valid. This is why the Republicans keep getting away with the same scams over and over. It's like freakin' Groundhog day.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by fredmast (September 12, 2010 8:40 pm ET)
      13  
      "This is a person who is fundamentally out of touch with how the world works, who happened to have played a wonderful con, as a result of which he is now president," Gingrich tells us.

      "I think he worked very hard at being a person who is normal, reasonable, moderate, bipartisan, transparent, accommodating -- none of which was true," Gingrich continues. "In the Alinksy tradition, he was being the person he needed to be in order to achieve the position he needed to achieve . . . He was authentically dishonest."



      JEEZus. Newt's so skilled at projection, he should be working in a movie theater.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by SMTDL (September 13, 2010 12:12 pm ET)
        7  
        Thanks Newt for your insight in letting us know that the south side of Chicago is not the real world(to you),even for a young Ivy League educated Biracial man from Hawaii who also happened to live in the Indonesia as a child.How could he be in touch with how the world works as compared to a conservative Southern white man.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by little poncho (September 12, 2010 9:08 pm ET)
      10  
      these wrong wingers, are drinking a new kool-aid...
      Report Abuse
    • Author by mescal (September 12, 2010 9:19 pm ET)
      12  


      "America today is governed by a ghost." - Newt Gingrich

      Does anyone here have any doubt that Gingrich had to restrain himself from using a far more loaded Synonym for "ghost"?

      Gingrich has now managed to remove any doubt about his racism, the putrid little terd.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by GrandpaMark (September 12, 2010 9:41 pm ET)
      14 1
      My racist family understands Newt's point in a primitive, visceral way. He's using a centuries old racist stereotype...he's saying that black people are genetically disposed to lie. He is recalling a fear that slaveowners had; the fear that their chattel were smiling and lying. The fear that the slave workforce would smile, and organize, and slaughter their owners. Another part of the lie is the belief that blacks are driven by hypersexual impulses impossible to control. This animal like drive for sex is believed by Newt and Fox Fanz to impel blacks to dress in provocative, depraved styles. Criticizing the first lady for her wardrobe is a way of playing up the idea that black people, even the president and his wife, are really more like animals than white people are. Another angle is the attack on Islam; slaveowners were terrified of slaves determining their own religion, especially if that religion is anything other than christianity. Muslims are now targeted; hence the drive to equate the word "muslim" with the word "n!gger". These are ancient fears, being brought to the surface, but our country has harbored these sentiments for hundreds of years. I would love a troll to tell me there is no racism, cuz, you know, Hannitty said so.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by mescal (September 12, 2010 10:27 pm ET)
        11  
        That post was right on the nose, GrandpaMark.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by pilotx (September 12, 2010 10:39 pm ET)
        13 1
        It all boils down to centuries of white supremecy. Like it or not we are all victims of this whether we know it or not. Call it what it is. 300+ years of dehumanization and stereotyping has made us all victims and mistrustful of one another. We are getting over this but people like Newt are trying to hold on to the last vestiges of power before a new more diverse generation that is not afraid of each other takes the reigns of power. Sad but not unexpected. No one gives up power without a fight. People are generally afraid of change so some will have to be dragged kicking and screaming into the 21st century. Let Newt and the old right have their little Klan rallies while the rest of us get down to the real work that needs to be done before we become a 3rd world nation.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by cugagcmu805031 (September 13, 2010 8:27 pm ET)
        4  
        "Criticizing the first lady for her wardrobe is a way of playing up the idea that black people, even the president and his wife, are really more like animals than white people are."

        I saw this in action on Yahoo! yesterday in the comments about the First Lady's trip to commemorate 9/11 in PA. There were many references to her being an ape, insults to her intelligence, attempts to tie her and the president to Islam and Muslims, and very ugly comments about Muslim-Americans. I was sick to my stomach before I had read fewer than 10 comments. None of the comments were based on facts, and they reflected hate in its purest form.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Meremark (September 12, 2010 10:30 pm ET)
      7  
      -

      Well, now, hold on a minute (or an hour, depending on reading speed).

      Newtie patooty is indeed jab-jabbering racist cant and doing it to provoke riotous racism among the afflicted audience suffering FUXed News. And, plausibly, also doing it because Newtie is racist to the core, himself, and 'thinks' that way.

      But he's onto something providing the idea that President Obama is beholden to, and obedient of, a deeply internalized mode of beliefs and behavior. Saying Obama is more (inside) than meets the eye on the surface. Saying Obama could be a CIA-programmed minion of military-industrial-complex warmongers and fear-sowers.

      Which might be the scenes and setting of the greatest crazy-making novel of all time -- "WarWar and PeaceWar" or somesuch whatever. The total i_r_o_n_y of it all, of course, would be if the wretched facism Contract-ers Newtie leads are all out demonizing one of their own ilk, (Obama). To be sure, the FUX News fops and fools aim to stir the bigoted racist gay-bashing xenophobic sad-souls for their votes, (... those people vote?), staying mum and never objecting about the militaristic torrent-war supremacism which Newtie and his crudes propound in-common with inner-Obama, outer-Rahm Emanuel and all the Bush-serving carryovers.

      Yet it is going to require a spell of suspended judgment before knee-jerk reacting, and focussed consideration of a lot of facts, on the part of Commenters hearing this for the first time here.

      The thesis in its exegesis must be based on a 2-step premise:
      1) that the CIA has been bent on producing a 'Manchurian candidate' empowered in Office, (POTUS, to their liking), before and ever since the 1959 book and 1962 movie memed the idea into the massmind; and,
      2) the subject (victim?) would have to be indoctrinated from pre-verbal infancy -- subtley, psychologically, profoundly, in order to produce the reliably-affected specimen.
      'Everyone' knows that 1) is true. Recently we're offered the chapter-and-verse of Obama's biography, (elsewhere 'officially' redacted before), in which 2) is true-to-life.

      The book-length report may be read (free) here: ThomHartmann.COM/users/wm/blog/2010/09/suppressed-evidence-showing-cia-indoctrination-obama, or in the 5-part original by Wayne Madsen Report (behind the paywall) at dates Aug.13-15, Aug.16, Aug.19, Aug.25, Aug.30-31 here: www.WayneMadsenReport.COM/sitemap.

      The viciously recriminating denials, repercussions, retaliations, following this report of Obama's biography by 'White House sources' has been quite telling and credence-lending in its ways and means. Surely there has been reaction to it, (but not lawsuit charging 'false reporting' or 'defamation' ... yet), and the back-channel White House has not remained cooly indifferent or distantly disinterested.

      So racist Newtie may be correct that Obama enacts a hidden agenda, but it is absolute cockupped b.s. that Obama has a racist motive; (like for himself Newtie seeks voters). Supremacist, maybe ... but we can read all about it and decide for ourselves.

      -
      Report Abuse
    • Author by pilotx (September 12, 2010 10:31 pm ET)
      11  
      Oh yes, these two men are quite special. D'Souza is now president of King's college in New York. As you may have guessed it is a Christian college that specializes in preparing leaders with a biblical worldview. We all know Newt's views about this nation being founded on biblical principles. Interesting. The right loves to talk about the constitution but look the other way when the 1st amendment is being ignored. Hey Newt, how come in your home state I can't go to the store and buy beer to drink while I watch football on Sunday? Why was that law enacted? Does it violate the 1st amendment in anyway? Funny how these two heavy religionists are the most bigotted people around. Have to especially love D'Souza's "The end of racism" in which he explains why racial profiling is ok. Sad.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by miraclelurker (September 13, 2010 12:19 am ET)
      11  
      Spoken like a true sociopath.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by usappa00 (September 13, 2010 1:55 am ET)
      10 1
      Newt, I thought you loved this country, because somewhere Osama Bin Ladin is smiling as he hears of your bigotry towards Islam and our President. You are playing into his hands.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by usappa00 (September 13, 2010 2:06 am ET)
      12  
      I think Gingrich has been spending a little too much time in the comments section over at Politico. He sounds like any other loon with Obama Derangement Syndrome.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Don Quixote (September 13, 2010 10:20 am ET)
      12 1
      This is simple: Ginrich is using code words for the n-word. It couldn't be anymore obvious.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by DeirdreFlanagan6 (September 13, 2010 11:04 am ET)
        7  
        Code? They don't need no stinking CODE....right Schlessinger? 'If you don't have a sense of humor n*****, don't marry white people.'
        OR
        According to Gingrich...you can't take Bl**** out of Africa but you can't take the Africa out of Bl*****
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Psychobilly (September 13, 2010 10:57 am ET)
      6  
      Oh my god ghost! ahhhhhhhh!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by ny2nc (September 13, 2010 11:41 am ET)
      12  
      This philandering, inebriated African socialist, who raged against the world for denying him the realization of his anticolonial ambitions, is now setting the nation's agenda through the reincarnation of his dreams in his son. The son makes it happen, but he candidly admits he is only living out his father's dream. The invisible father provides the inspiration, and the son dutifully gets the job done. America today is governed by a ghost.


      Yeah, but George W. Bush is no longer president.

      Must. Kill. Saddam. To. Avenge. Daddy.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by NiceguyEddie (September 13, 2010 11:49 am ET)
      9 1
      "I think he worked very hard at being a person who is normal, reasonable, moderate, bipartisan, transparent, accommodating -- none of which was true," Gingrich continues. "In the Alinksy tradition, he was being the person he needed to be in order to achieve the position he needed to achieve . . . He was authentically dishonest."

      The only person being "authentically dishonest" he is Newt Gingrich. (Big surprise.) If you want to know what's REALLY killing any kind of bi-partisanship in Washington, and why Obama is completely wasting his time (and Liberal's patience) trying to compromise with these fools, it's this attitude than even if he gives them everything they want, and acts exactly the way they do, they will say that's it's all being done to "fool us" or to give us a "false sense of security." They are so desperate to paint his as something he's not, that they'll take every bit of evidence to the contrary of their narritive, and say that it SUPPORTS their narritive because it's all part of the ploy.

      Yeah, maybe. Or (more likely) you lot are just so full of $#!t that couldn't tell the truth if someone put a gun to your head.

      Obama has not done one truly liberal thing since coming into office. Not one. We're still in two wars, taxes haven't gone up (down even more, in fact, but the Right still complains), health care reform was gutted to satify the Right (who voted against it anyway), Banking reform was weakened to satify the Right (who voted against it anyway), Centrist Moderates were nominated to the Supreme Court (but the Right painted them as radicals anyway)...

      What has the man done that so "radical"? If this is "all a ploy" the Right may as well keep him in office. He's pretty much done everything they've wanted, even as they complain about being "shut out" of negotiations. (More BS - Obama's done everything bar picking them up and hand-carrying them into the room himself to bring them into nehotiations!)

      This is ridiculous. It's the typical paranoid, conspiracy-theory bull$#!t that we see with the truthers, the birthers, the anti-vaxers, etc... That LACK of supporting evidence is somehow proof that it's being kept secret, that the conspiracy is working.

      ------------------------------------------
      Yeah... OR: You're just an idiot.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by doggeddem (September 13, 2010 12:14 pm ET)
      8  
      Terrific. The serial adulterer,ammoral pig is now quoting another bigot, D'Souza to support his pathetic claims that Obama is not really an American. Frankly, Gingrich is as American as Adolph Eichmann. I hope he chokes and dies.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by lexalexander (September 13, 2010 12:18 pm ET)
      8  
      So Dinesh D'souza says in all seriousness American conservatives have more in common with the Taliban than with American liberals like that's a good thing and nobody says a word.

      Markos Moulitsas says it in something less than total seriousness, points out that it's actually a bad thing, and even liberals criticize him.

      [facepalm]
      Report Abuse
      • Author by blesscurse (September 13, 2010 2:59 pm ET)
        8  
        I'm concerned that Newt Gingrich's serial adultery might anger Islamist extremists enough for them to attack us again. A close reading of D'Souza's 9-11 causation thesis indicates that it was this sort of decadent moral breakdown that caused Al Qaeda to attack us in 2001. Maybe Gingrich should renounce his new-found Catholicism and return to C Street for consultations with Ensign and Vitter regarding the moral high ground. Maybe D'Souza can convince virtue paragons Mark Foley, Jack Abramoff and Larry Craig to come on board.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by DuffyShort (September 13, 2010 1:00 pm ET)
      8 1
      Why doesn't he go ahead and use the "N" word. That's what he wants to do! He divorces his wives when he already has a replacement in tow. He is a chicken sh*t.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by cugagcmu805031 (September 13, 2010 8:34 pm ET)
        4 1
        DuffyShort,

        People like Newt, Palin, Limbaugh, and Glenda won't say it, and they don't have to. They have filled the minds of their supporters with so much evil that they are now using the word on some blogs. I was on Think Progress last week when one of the rw trolls used it. It is very offensive to me because I grew up in this country under segregation and have been called the word many, many times. I don't use it because my parents had a rule about it. My siblings and I were taught that to use the word would mean that we thought of ourselves in the same way as those who used it against us.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by draftedin68 (September 13, 2010 1:42 pm ET)
      7  
      "Profound" indeed!

      When I first read Newt's comments, the phrase "the most profound insight" really stood out.

      For a long, long time, Newt's shtick has been to put on airs of profoundness. He has always reminded me of a really, really good manure salesman with a mouthful of samples.

      Along with many other dog-whistle phrases from his past, these latest comments provide actual "profound insight" to Newt's own Southern Strategy.


      Report Abuse
    • Author by MsYellowDog (September 13, 2010 2:52 pm ET)
      6 1
      Gingrich needs to furnish a Glossary Of Terms from now on,when he wants to insult Obama. I don't understand what "having a Kenyan,anti-colonial worldview" is supposed to mean,and how it applies to ANYTHING in today's world.Gingrich is really floundering,trying to become relevant.Not happening.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by edbermac (September 13, 2010 2:55 pm ET)
      6  
      Sounds like the Newtster has been nipping at Rush's Oxycontin supply.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by MsYellowDog (September 13, 2010 3:23 pm ET)
      5  
      My understand of the term "anti-colonialism" is that it's a GOOD THING if you(or anyone) is against colonialism as it used to be practiced.When did the meaning change to a bad thing? I understand that the Kenyan part is REALLY BAD,but I can't imagine how the other is supposed to be interpreted.Maybe Newtie had a few too many before he said that?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by draftedin68 (September 13, 2010 4:55 pm ET)
        5  
        pneumonoultramicroscopicsilicovolcanokoniosis

        Newt isn't really counting on his glassy-eyed flock actually understanding what he says.

        What really matters to his dog whistled, fact-deprived followers is the number of multi-syllable words he uses 'cause that means he must be smart.

        Right?

        Report Abuse
    • Author by jediknight65 (September 13, 2010 6:26 pm ET)
      5 1
      hey where are the gutless wonder troll club defending newt on this?

      oh wait i forgot for a min who i was talking about.....
      Report Abuse
    • Author by sluggo (September 13, 2010 9:21 pm ET)
      3  
      To have even a cable channel present this kind of mindless racists garbage without comment or pushback is really stunning.

      I just can't believe that the companies having their products advertised on this network are really OK with this kind of stuff. To have their product ad follow such naked racists statements would really make me (if I was on the board of the company) to have second thoughts. At some point there is going to be a backlash and the questions will be directed to the companies CEOs advertising on FOX:

      "Why did you continue to pay ad dollars to a network that was producing clearly racists propaganda on a daily basis and inciting their viewers to violence? Was this in the best interests of your shareholders?"

      Report Abuse
    • Author by MilitantMNMan (September 14, 2010 12:22 am ET)
      4  
      You can't put "Dinesh D'Souza" and "stunning insight" in the same sentence.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by fantagor (September 14, 2010 1:28 am ET)
      3 1
      As translated from wing-nut to human:

      "Obama is black and I, Newt Gingrich, am in FAVOR of American colonialism and think it is reasonable for the US to maintain HUNDREDS of US military bases around the world in perpetuity and expressly to wage more resource wars around the globe."

      Randy
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Winski (September 14, 2010 12:11 pm ET)
      1 2
      So I wonder...Did Newt think this up on his own OR did that blow-up automaton he's recently been seen carting around??? HHHuummmm.... Did Newt and the fatman from palm beach get a deal on a doubles deal?? Don't they kinda look alike?? Hummm..

      Speaking of the fatman, when is Koran-burning, high-school paling Rev. Jones gonna be on the fatman's radio show?? This should give the fatman material for weeks !!

      Has his 15th wife filed for divorce yet or do we have to wait until the air finally comes out of Newt's blow-up companion??
      Report Abuse
    • Author by scsurfer (September 14, 2010 11:17 pm ET)
      1 1
      Did he just call the President of the United States of America a Mau Mau?
      WTF?
      Keep in mind folks this loon wants to be president himself. . .whoa.
      Report Abuse